-->

Sunday, July 25, 2021

Portrait of an Archbishop as a Young Man


On Being a Hallinan’s Granddaughter

When you attend a Catholic school and a teacher discovers you’re a granddaughter of “The Hallinans,” they treat you differently. At least, that’s the way it was growing up in Tempe, Arizona in the 1990s at Our Lady of Mount Carmel School.
 
My grandfather, Arthur Hallinan, Sr., and grandmother, Dorothy Jane Hallinan, were not only active members of the Phoenix Roman Catholic Diocese, they were also good friends of The Daverns, both families ardent Irish Catholics.
 
The Daverns’ son, Fr. Timothy Davern, was the pastor at Mt. Carmel and was fondly known as “Fr. Tim” to my brothers and sisters. Now, Fr. Tim would always be somewhat cross with students who were bending the rules just a little, but to my sister, Molly, and me, he was always kind and would always sneak in some type of Notre Dame parody or comment about the fighting Irish into the conversation.

This was because of our relationship to Archbishop Paul John Hallinan, my great uncle (my grandfather’s brother) -- someone I never met but of whom I have heard many loving stories about over the years.
 
“Fr. Paul” as my mother’s family called him, graduated from Notre Dame University several years ahead of Fr. Tim, but he was intimately familiar with my great uncle’s thought leadership in the Catholic Church, his liturgical reform advocacy at the Vatican II conference, and his focus on racial equality and social justice as a priest in the Cleveland Diocese, as Bishop of Charleston, and later as Archbishop of the Atlanta Diocese where Fr. Paul had served until his death in 1968 at the young age of 57.

My mother, Marie Hallinan, showed off her favorite pieces of literature on our “main bookshelf” in the living room of our childhood home. These include: Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce, The Collected Poems of W.B. Yeats, and a biography of Paul Hallinan -- her uncle.

Inside the front cover leaf of the biography is an inscription: “To my favorite niece Marie.” This was, of course, funny because Marie was his only niece. [Picture of the dedication to come! My mother is in the process of renovating her home.]

In the book is a newspaper clipping that bookmarks a certain page. Further examination of this bookmark reveals a moving picture of Archbishop Paul Hallinan and the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.  (See image above.)

MLK is, of course, iconic. Not only due to historic character in the Civil Rights Movements of the1960s, but also the context of his work and how it matters today.

Fr. Paul’s first act as Archbishop of Atlanta during the peak of the tumultuous Civil Rights climate was to order the integration of all Catholic institutions under his jurisdiction.
 
He also encouraged Roman Catholic priests and nuns to participate in the Selma to Montgomery marches and encouraged Atlanta Catholics to open their neighborhoods “so Negroes can exercise the right of every American to live where he wishes.”

But, who is my great-grand uncle? And what is the context behind this iconic family photo?

A Legacy of Equality

Reading Coretta Scott’s memoir My Life with Martin Luther King, Jr., she mentions how she first received word of her husband receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964. Dr. King was in the hospital, a day needed to rest, and Scott woke him with the good news.

Later that day, once news begins to spread about Martin receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, one of the first to visit Dr. King in the hospital is Archbishop Paul Hallinan.
 
“News of the announcement of the prize spread rapidly. Martin was visited by Archbishop Hallinan of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta. Bishop Hallinan offered his congratulations and then said to Martin, ‘May I give you my blessing?’ Martin said, ‘Of course,” and the Archbishop received a traditional blessing and then make the sign of the cross. Martin responded, then to his surprise the Archbishop sank to his knees beside his [hospital] bed and quietly said, “May I receive your blessing?’

“Later Martin told me how humbled he felt and how beautiful it was that a Roman Catholic Archbishop would receive the blessing of a Baptist preacher named Martin Luther.”

A similar version of the tale was told by Andrew Young, Dr. King's colleague in civil-rights activism, and later a congressperson and UN ambassador, which you can listen to fully here.
 
Young recalls: "I had a fit. [I never thought] I'd see a Roman Catholic archbishop down on his knees ask for a blessing by a black preacher named Martin Luther."
 
I think that in all the research I’ve written for this article, this must be my favorite story about Fr. Paul’s interaction with Dr. King. It’s a consistent one about joined morals from these leaders, no matter what religion or race, celebrating the good yet seemingly hard notion about living in a world of equality, humbly and full of compassion.

Not Very "Noble”


In 1964, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. won the Nobel Peace Prize for practicing nonviolent protests during an era where racial segregation was being practiced. He was the first to receive the prize in Georgia.
 
In what should have been a celebratory time for the state to have one of its natives of Montgomery to receive such an honor, the Georgia governor, Lester Maddox, an outspoken segregationist, chose not to recognize Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
 
An article in The New York Times from Dec. 29, 1964 states: “Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. and William B. Hartsfield, former Mayor, have moved in forcefully but quietly to prevent any incident that would become a snub to Dr. King.”

Instead of what should have been a public display of congratulations from the state turned into a grassroots effort by the moral authorities and community businesses of Georgia.

“About 10 days ago, letters were sent to more than 100 leaders in business, education, religion, politics, and civic affairs asking them to join as sponsors of a banquet on Jan. 27 at the Dinker Plaza Hotel here.”

The letters were signed by the Most Rev. Paul J. Hallinan, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Atlanta; Rabbi Jacob Rothschild; Dr. Benjamin Mays, president of Morehouse College; and Ralph McGill, publisher of The Atlantic Constitution.

What’s more disheartening is that the article further illustrates that “most of those receiving the letters have not replied” showing the political and racial climate during this time.

In another New York Times article titled “Banquet for Dr. King Gets More Backing” -- published two days later -- 25 more businesses are included in the mix.
 
But why?

Not Part of the “Scripto”

Apparently, Dr. King, at the time, had been active in a boycott for Scripto, Inc., a leading manufacturer of pens, pencils, and ink in Atlanta. Many workers in the company were African American, and a “worldwide” picketing of the company ensued due to the poor condition its black workers were objected to.

Even more, many of the workers attended the Ebenezer Baptist Church where Dr. King and his father were co-pastors.

The Scripto issue was happening during the same time as the dinner was being planned, and many leading business members of the Atlanta community were on Scripto’s “side,” leading to a small number of business participants supporting the dinner.

According to another New York Times article published on Dec. 31, 1964: “The board chairman of Scripto, James V. Carmichael, is a man widely respected in the business community. He has been identified with many civic endeavors and has had a reputation as a moderate in racial matters. Some business leaders’ personal regard for Mr. Carmichael seemed to be a factor in the initial adverse reaction to plans for the King dinner.”

Yet, once the boycott was called off by Scripto and Dr. King alike, many more business members became interested in sponsoring the banquet for the Nobel Prize winner.

A Celebration of Support

Brighid
From left to right: Rabbi Jacob Rothschild, Dr. Benjamin Mays, who was president of Morehouse College (and one of MLK's mentors), Archbishop Paul J. Hallinan, and Ralph McGill, 
who was the publisher of the Atlanta Constitution. 

A snub by the state of Georgia. Hesitant community sponsors. A boycott against a then-major manufacturer for racial issues.

Through all of this, it makes me consistently proud how my great uncle kept his moral compass in support of Dr. King.

The January 27, 1985 banquet in support of Dr. King’s Nobel Peace Prize was such a success that event planners actually had to turn away checks to purchase tickets. In what was originally hoped for 1,000 community members to join at $6.94/ticket, an impressive request for 1,400 tickets was made, but settled on 1,200 tickets.

From another New York Times article titled “A Banquet in Honor of Dr. King is Set for Atlanta Wednesday”: “‘[Don McEvoy, Georgia executive director of the National Conference of Christians and Jews] said that 101 Atlanta citizens agreed to serve as sponsors of the event.  About three-fourths of these are white.”

Final Thoughts

I wish we could say the world is a different place than the 1960s in terms of racial issues.  And, of course, many things have changed for the better, but we still have a long way to go in terms for true equality.

However, I am proud to be the far-off great niece of such a compassionate and loving man whose actions truly pave the way for a kinder world where we are not judged by the religion we choose to worship, the color of our skin, our age, what we wear – a world of zero judgement. These actions of peace my grand uncle modelled, I hope, captures positive future influence from my daughter, my niece and nephews, and my students.

Thank you to my uncle, Chuck Hallinan, for giving me this “assignment,” even though it took me ages to write. And thank you to my brother, Paul Tomasik, for giving me thoughtful notes on my rough draft as I was trying to perfect this blog post, my mom, Marie Hallinan, for her awesome back-up notes (“Great point, Paul!”), and my patient and always-editor husband, Adam Constable.

Thursday, July 1, 2021

LaVerne Mooney Part II

 

Cousin LaVerne Mooney:

Part II – A Melancholy Middle

St. Luke did not have many facts about our Lord upon which to report for His ages 12 to 30 years.  Neither do I for LaVerne.  In the absence of facts, as every Irishman knows, one is allowed an increase in degrees of freedom to invoke one’s own inspired imagination.  While inspired, unlike the sainted physician, I am only imperfectly so.  The leaps I take in this missive, I trust, the reader will find, at least, reasonable.  

In gratitude for the facts we do have, a tip of the hat to Chuck Hallinan and the other contributors to the Hallinan-Mooney PAF file!

 The U.S. 1910 Census informs us that Laverne, age 12, resided at the Mooney Rockport (aka “Berea”) farm.  Question: Where did James and LaVerne reside from 1902 until James was institutionalized on March 25, 1905?   I think it reasonable to speculate that at some point after Cora’s death in November 1902, James and LaVerne moved to the Berea farm.

James Leo Mooney’s death certificate indicates the cause of death as chronic myocarditis with epilepsy as a contributory cause.  The coroner’s report states that the onset of James heart condition, the immediate cause of death, was in 1930.  The report also notes that signs of epilepsy, the contributory cause, began in 1900.  If true then James epileptic like seizures began before the traumatic events of his life in 1902, i.e., death of his daughter, Loretta, and wife, Cora.

If accurate, the coroner’s report also tells us that James’ unpredictable seizures likely rendered him an unreliable caretaker for his infant daughter after Cora’s death.  LaVerne’s maternal grandparents, the Kelseys, lived more than 40 miles away in Kipton, Ohio.  We also know that Captain Ed’s modus operandi was never to abandon his own when in need. 

So, shortly after Cora Kelsey Mooney’s death in November 1902, I speculate that, James (age 32) and LaVerne (age 4) joined the Mooney family becoming then the 7th and 8th members of Captain Ed’s clan to take up residence at the farm: Captain Ed (age 57), his wife Margaret (age 46), sons William (age 25), Charles (age 17), daughter Zita (age 12) and sister-in-law Sarah (Sadie) Sharon (age 43). 

After 3 years of caring for his eldest son at the farm, Captain Ed decided, reluctantly I believe, to commit James to the Ohio Hospital for Epileptics in hopes that James would be cured of his seizures.

LaVerne Mooney

As other family stories indicate, Captain Ed was a generous man.  So also will this story.  County property records suggest that Captain Ed’s generosity did not come only from his surplus.  With the arrival of  infant LaVerne and ailing James, Captain Ed and Margaret, perhaps facing a liquidity problem, mortgaged their farm in October of 1905.  Less than a year later, in August 1906, they sold property only recently purchased on Cleveland’s east side for $4,000 with the buyers’ assumption of their outstanding $1,000 mortgage.   
 
At the time, three of the five household members were likely contributing to household expenses. In 1902 Captain Bill was on the water (as “Second Mate Bill”), Sarah Sharon was working as a dress-maker and Charles as a “Window Draper”.  However, Zita and LaVerne were still on Captain Ed’s payroll, so to speak.  Young girls can be expensive to maintain, fashionable clothing being just one such expense category.
 


Aunt Zita and LaVerne 
finding shade beneath 
 their Edwardian hats.

 

  

We do have (a tip of the hat again to Chuck Hallinan!) a news

article reporting that Zita and LaVerne visited LaVerne’s maternal grandparents (the Kelsey’s) in Kipton, Ohio (~ 20 miles southwest of Elyria) in August 1906.  The article suggests that Zita was a friend to Cora Kelsey’s sister, Nellie, who was just 6 months younger than Zita.


Aunt Zita and LaVerne: "Kipton or bust!"

Best guess: a 1904 De Dion-Bouton Model Z Tonneau

1910-De-Dion-Bouton-Modele-Routier-25
 

First "Berea 1" road race ~ 1910.

Edwardian cars driven by ladies with Edwardian hats.  (No hats or hairdos were injured in this race; top speed ~20 Mph) .

 

LaVerne Mooney
The four women -- Margaret, her sister Sarah (Sadie) Sharon, daughter Zita and grand niece LaVerne -- eventually took over management of the farm. Captain Bill married Evangeline on January 26, 1910 and moved with his bride to 9407 Detroit Avenue.  Captain Ed departed this life on December 21, 1910.  Charles joined the U.S. Army and was off to San Antonio, Texas in 1917 for basic training and then onto Europe to fight the Germans. The men’s departure left the women to manage the farm.  

LaVerne Mooney

 

As Chuck Hallinan has reported in this blog, the year 1918 was a hard one for the Mooney family.  In March, Zita’s mother, Margaret, died and in December, Evangeline died. 

 

Charles & LaVerne Mooney
On his return from WWI in early 1919, after mustering out of the army, Charles may have briefly returned to the farm as the photo to the right suggests, but soon after returning to the United States Charles relocated to San Antonio, TX to pursue his career in interior design.

In 1920, LaVerne and Zita vacated the farm and took up residence at Zita’s newly purchased home at 4827 Riverside Dr., located just south of the farm.  A number of real estate transactions beginning in 1920 and culminating in 1923 show that Captain Ed’s heirs and the Sharon heirs sold both the Mooney and Sharon farms. 

During this time, 1915 - 1920, LaVerne pursued her education, qualifying as a stenographer around 1920.  The stenotype, invented in 1913, was the novel Information Technology machine at the turn of the 20th century.  Stenographers, like LaVerne, were at the cutting edge of modern office technologies.

LaVerne Mooney

From 1921 to 1923, LaVerne worked as stenographer for various companies in the Cleveland area.  In 1922, or thereabouts, Zita relocated to San Antonio to join step-brother Charles in his business as an interior decorator.  We lose track of LaVerne from 1923 to 1928.  However, by 1928, we know that LaVerne is in Columbus, OH.   

 

Sometime after Zita’s left Ohio in 1922 and before 1928, LaVerne relocated to Columbus, perhaps to allow more frequent visits to her father at the Ohio Hospital for Epileptics in Gallipolis (~ 100 miles to the south) or to intervene in his treatment.  A movement was underway to legalize the sterilization of "undesirables", i.e., epileptics, in Ohio and the hospital's superintendent was a strong promoter. The idea of Social Darwinism altered Darwin's notion of the survival of the fittest to survival for only the fittest.  The idea of eliminating the "unfit" from society influenced Americans, especially during early 1920’s.  The acceptance of eugenics, especially the sterilization of epileptic inmates, as a necessary treatment to protect society from the "feeble-minded" was growing.  It's promoters began to seek enabling legislation to work their largely unfounded hypothesis.  (See Post Script: Ohio Hospital for Epileptics- Hospital or Asylum?).

On May 5, 1928, LaVerne (age 29) and Mearl Harned (age 37) applied for a marriage license at the Franklin County courthouse and solemnized their marriage the following month on June 15, 1928.  In the subsequent year, the 1929 Columbus City Directory lists LaVerne as a stenographer at the Town & Village Insurance Agency.  A good guess is that LaVerne met Mearl at the Columbus office of the Equitable Life Insurance Company where Mearl was an Assistant Manager. 

Sometime after 1929, LaVerne and Mearl moved to Pennsylvania where Mearl operated a Gulf Oil gas station.  The station most likely was located in Crawford County, PA, Mearl’s birthplace as listed on the marriage license.  Perhaps Mearl and LaVerne, like others, experienced a financial setback following the October 1929 stock market crash.  Or one or both lost their jobs as the Great Depression gripped the economy.  As a result, they decided to live with or near family choosing Mearl’s family in Pennsylvania. 
 
Mearl Harned ~ 1930

Family tradition reports that “Mearl took off with another woman” shortly after they relocated to PA.  A good guess as to the “other woman” was Golda Nevada Hanes,  a local who, like Mearl, was in her second marriage also soon to be on the rocks.  After being deserted in ~ 1930, LaVerne returned to Cleveland but did not divorce Mearl until sometime after 1937.  Mearl and Golda bounced around as “man and wife” in PA and NY until 1960 when Mearl married “Goldie”.

We know that LaVerne was close to her aunt Zita. Chuck H’s  research shows that, until her death in April 1939, Aunt Sarah (Sadie) Sharon was also close to her niece, Zita.  After Zita’s departure to Texas from ~ 1922 to 1937, and LaVerne’s to Pennsylvania, the threesome reunited in Cleveland sometime before 1937.

(It is, I think, odd that Sarah is absent in all the Mooney group photos (that I have) taken at the farm during family reunions.  Perhaps Sarah was the group’s designated photographer.)

LaVerne, Zita and Sadie -- Lifelong Friends

Sarah (Sadie) Sharon
             Bridget (Aunt) Zita Mooney              

LaVerne Mooney


 


 

 

 

 

1343 West Blvd.

The 1934 Cleveland City Directory lists LaVerne (age 36) and Sarah (Sadie) Mooney (age 75) residing at 1343 West Blvd.  It's reasonable to think that LaVerne on her return to Cleveland moved in to live with her great Aunt Sadie.

 

Sometime before May of 1937, Aunt Zita returned to Cleveland from San Antonio and joined LaVerne and Sarah at the same address.  The San Antonio, Texas newspaper's report on the death of Charles Mooney's reads, "Charles Mooney ... died in Cleveland, Ohio, Thursday night after a year's illness. ... He disposed of his interests here a month ago and went to Cleveland to reside with his sister, Miss Vita [sic] Mooney."  Charles died May 20, 1937 (age 52). 

The three generations of Sharon/Mooney women, reunited after 15 years, remained at the West Blvd. address until Sarah's death on April 3, 1939 (age 80).   After Sarah's death, records show that LaVerne moved to 1373 W. 80th Street Apt. #4.  Although the City Directory does not list Aunt Zita as residing in the same apartment building on W. 80th until 1951, it's reasonable to assume she remained with LaVerne after Sarah's death.

Another Tip o' the Hat to those who contribute to the PAF file!


Post Script: Ohio Hospital for Epileptics- Hospital or Asylum?

Gallipolis is along the Ohio River about 55 miles southeast of Chillicothe and 44 miles northwest of Charleston, West Virginia.  In 1892, Governor William McKinley of Ohio authorized funding for the construction of a facility to care of for the state’s epileptics.  (McKinley’s wife, Ida Saxton, after the death of their two infant daughters [Katherine (b.1871, d.1875] and Ida [b.1873, d.1873], descended into a deep depression and was diagnosed as epileptic.)  Moved perhaps by his personal experience, McKinley initiated the first public work program in the United States to provide for the care of epileptics.

  there were approximately 7,000 Ohio residents with epilepsy, many residing in the community with varying degrees of success and supervision, with 417 in county infirmaries, 165 in state asylums and 64 in county jails—646 in all. (Ohio Hospital for Epileptics (1901). CE Brinkworth, Buffalo, NY, pp. 68).

The Ohio Legislature provisionally titled the facility, “The Asylum for Epileptics and Epileptic Insane”. Prior to its opening, the facility underwent a name change to, “The Ohio Hospital for Epileptics”, indicating a lack of understanding as to the cause of the disease and its treatabiltiy.  On Thanksgiving Day, November 20, 1893, Governor McKinley declared the opening of the facility for the admission of patients, the first of the specialized epilepsy colonies in the United States.

In 1901, the hospital consisted of an administration building, thirteen residence cottages, a number of support buildings, and a building for insane patients that could house two hundred people.  Unfortunately, the early reviews were not good:

The original institution … was little better than a series of unlovely barracks, closely grouped, of severe lines and cheerless.  The so-called “cottages” were designed for from fifty to seventy-five patients each, admitted of little or no clinical aggregation of cases, and were much too large for discipline.  In fact, the original plan of institution apparently was the creating of a special almshouse for the housing of the state’s epileptics.  (JAMA; October 15, 1904; THE OHIO HOSPITAL FOR EPILEPTICS, Vol. XLIII No.16: pp.1151-1152.)

The 1910 US Census list James as a patient at Gallipolis.  However, the 1920 Census lists him as an inmate and the 1930 Census reverts his status back to patient perhaps because of his heart condition.  Whether this classification was based on revised physical evaluation or bureaucratic election is unknown.  It is likely based on where the person physically resided, i.e., cottage or asylum.  Other than this change in his status, I do not know much about James’ life at Gallipolis from 1905 until his death in 1936.  Unfortunately, the family tradition makes no mention of him and he is not in the photographs taken on the occasion of reunions at the West Park farm or elsewhere.

It seems clear that there was growing acceptance of eugenics in the general environment of institutional care in Ohio. By an act of the Legislature during the 1910–11 session, a Central Board of Administration was created to oversee all state benevolent institutions, uniting 18 state institutions under one administrative authority. In 1912, Allen W. Thurman, President of the State Board of Administration, declared that if a law for sterilization was not passed the State of Ohio would be bankrupt within ten years by the expense of caring for the weak-minded (New York Times, 9/25/1912). 

In 1918, The Ohio State Institution Journal was established, publishing articles from staff and superintendents across Ohio’s institutions. Here eugenic views were very publicly espoused, advocating the need to segregate “the unfit” of many types, including those with epilepsy, and curtail their ability to reproduce through surgical means (Emerick, 1918; Haynes, 1920; Clark, 1920; Goebel, 1920).

Dr. G. G. Kineon headed the Ohio Hospital for Epileptics for 32 years from June 1911 until his death in 1943.  Following Dr. Kineon’s appointment as Superintendent, “there was growing acceptance of eugenics in the general environment of institutional care in Ohio” (Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775289/).

 

{His] eugenic views were very publicly espoused, advocating the need to segregate “the unfit” of many types, including those with epilepsy, and curtail their ability to reproduce through surgical means. …

 

In 1919, in “Heredity as a Factor in Epilepsy”, Kineon discussed the causes of epilepsy with an emphasis on hereditary. He showed a bias to assume a hereditary etiology …

The State of Ohio alone has between eight thousand and nine thousand recorded epileptics … a great many of these are unrestricted and allowed to propagate their species … this is a big mistake and a gross injustice to the people of our State.

… may it not be well to consider sterilization of the chronically defective as a means of preventing the propagation of their species? (John Schwartz, Assistant Physician at the Ohio Hospital for Epileptics).

Our failure [at treating epilepsy] is largely due to the fact that we are trying to tackle the problem from the wrong end. We … neglect to cure those who may succeed him. In other words, … we start to find a way to prevent them from developing into new plants like the parents from which they sprang.

If you cut down the parent thistle plant, there can be no production of its kind. The same holds good with the epileptic—only we cannot actually cut down the parent, but the production of the offspring can be prevented …

There are different methods by which a reduction in the number of defectives may be accomplished; first, by education of the general public concerning …the best methods to prevent the continuance of undesirable hereditary taints …. Education is the only method which will induce people to adopt such preventative measures as segregation and sterilization. (Kineon, 1920, p. 59).

What the eugenists lacked in data, they made up with enthusiasm.  Under the pretense of being science, the promoters claimed the cause of  the "defectives" burdening society to be hereditary.  The promise of eugenics -- the controlled breeding of supermen -- coursed across the U.S.   How would LaVerne, a 22 year old woman, the daughter of a diagnosed and institutionalized epileptic, react to this crusade to sterilize the "feeble-minded"?  Did LaVerne believe she had the predisposition for epilepsy?  Did thinking so affect her decision to marry or have children?  We'll have to wait for the Parousia to find out.

See:  The Eugenics Crusade  https://www.pbs.org/video/the-eugenics-crusade-jtaetc/ 

Post-Post Script: 

While visiting Sharon at her home in Ohio on July 24, 2021, I reviewed her files on our Mooney family history.   The file contained a large sketch pad sheet with notes Sharon made while discussing the family tree with my Mom.  Sharon did not remember the date of her notes.  (Ignore her doodling on how to properly do eye makeup.)

In the second image, I zoomed in on the sketch and read that James Leo had his first attack on the night of Loretta's death (1902) and had a steel plate in his skull as a result of a childhood accident.  This new info calls for a correction to the LaVerne Mooney story.  Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a known cause of epilepsy.  However, the first attack for over 75% of such injuries occurs in the first 24 hours.  Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) occurs less often but may explain James Leo's condition.

I recall in a family tradition that Martin Leo Mooney died from falling on or being gored by a cow's horn.  Perhaps the story cited Martin Leo instead of James Leo as the victim and the fact that James Leo survived rather than died was less dramatic (Irish rule on storytelling employed).